Photo
eyeskammer:

”I don`t feel enjoyment watching films that evoke passivity. If you need that kind of comfort, I don`t understand why you wouldn`t go to a spa.In our lives, we have good things and bad things, happiness and pain. Life is full of pain and happiness and that`s what I wanted to show.”

eyeskammer:

”I don`t feel enjoyment watching films that evoke passivity. If you need that kind of comfort, I don`t understand why you wouldn`t go to a spa.
In our lives, we have good things and bad things, happiness and pain. Life is full of pain and happiness and that`s what I wanted to show.”

(via spiraphobia)

Photoset

huntsmonsters:

Shot Construction - 1/? - Sympathy for Lady Vengeance Dir. Park Chan-Wook
I’m a total nerd for film and shot construction, and I think some people still don’t think about the fact that the close-reading techniques used in literary studies can be applied to film. Never forget that a good director usually structures shots with purpose, filming constraints notwithstanding, and if you notice something like a shot structure being repeated over and over, it’s probably for a reason.

I figured I might as well start with a master of visual symbolism, Park Chan-Wook, who clearly adores coding this stuff thematically into his shot structure. Analysis, like anything else in the sphere of criticism, is a matter of opinion and dissection, so this is just what I get from the shot structure of this film.

From the top down:

  • Left/right opposition in almost every shot including Geum-Ja and Jenny. Symbolizes their opposition but also their harmony as mother and daughter. The space between them also grows smaller throughout the film until they are literally pressed against each other when they reconcile.
  • Color structure - Geum-Ja in blues with blue background, Geun-shik in the red vest with red background highlighting contrasts between the two characters, warm demeanor against cold.
  • Kneeling - typically appears in scenes of prayer, where Geum-Ja is asking forgiveness. (also see bottom right). More interestingly, note the claustrophobic framing of the candles and the walls/furniture, symbolizing feeling of being trapped in sin.
  • Geum-Ja in close-up - Typically the character is depicted at a neutral camera angle in violent scenes. She’s shot from below, often looking down, when thinking of sins she has commited or plans to commit. This shot structure appears many times during the movie. Compare this to one of the final shots, from above, looking up, when the deed is done and she is seeking to be forgiven.
  • Women and the adversary - These are just two examples of the many shots of Geum-ja and adverserial male figures. She is usually shot on an equal playing field with them, in profile, directly at opposition. Compare to the shot in the row second from the bottom, where Geum-Ja’s friend is again shot in profile at the dinner table (as she has been in almost every scene she appears with Baek). This time, after she drugs him, she is positioned higher than him, literally, in the shot structure (one could draw a diagonal line from the top of her head to his) displaying the shift in power structure. The same line exists in the shot beside it with Geum-Ja and Baek, a perfect triangle that firmly establishes the position of power in the scene.
  • The group shots - Mixed in are the shots of groups. Particularly the group of vengeful parents is shot all in a row, all on equal footing, and all included in the shot at once, indicating their togetherness in the plot, that they will sink or swim together.

(via spiraphobia)

Text

I’m trying to avoid the tags at the moment for Stoker spoilers, but we should be back in business after I’ve seen Stoker, which hopefully would be at some point this week.

I’ll tag #stoker spoilers, so pop that in your tumblr saviour if you don’t want to see anything 

Photoset

-Did you kill him?

-Not yet

(Source: jimmyconways, via fuckyeahasianhorror)

Photo
marinah2oblue:

Park Chan Wook and Mia Wasikowska photographed by Hong Jang Hyun, March 8th Anniversary 2013 of W Magazine Korea

marinah2oblue:

Park Chan Wook and Mia Wasikowska photographed by Hong Jang Hyun, March 8th Anniversary 2013 of W Magazine Korea

(via dorothy-cotton)

Photo
abatida:

Park Chan-Wook on the relationship with his lead actors in Thirst(박쥐 - Bakjwi )

Months before we started to shoot the film, we would have all these get together. And of course Song Kang-ho already knew about this film. I told them about the story almost ten years ago, so he always knew that he’d be playing this character. But we had a newcomer Kim Ok-vin, the actress. Together, I, Song Kang-ho, Kim Ok-vin, along with the actor who plays the husband, we would travel together and go on excursions outside of Seoul. We would drink together, talk about our personal matters, and of course, we’d talk about the film as well. Sometimes there were discussions, debates, and arguments. We would drink together and all fall asleep in the same room together. During this process, what was important for the lead actress was for her to feel protected, and it was important for us to really embrace her, and not to have her feel that she was being exploited in any way. So we developed a great relationship, like brothers and sisters. [x]

abatida:

Park Chan-Wook on the relationship with his lead actors in Thirst(박쥐 - Bakjwi )

Months before we started to shoot the film, we would have all these get together. And of course Song Kang-ho already knew about this film. I told them about the story almost ten years ago, so he always knew that he’d be playing this character. But we had a newcomer Kim Ok-vin, the actress. Together, I, Song Kang-ho, Kim Ok-vin, along with the actor who plays the husband, we would travel together and go on excursions outside of Seoul. We would drink together, talk about our personal matters, and of course, we’d talk about the film as well. Sometimes there were discussions, debates, and arguments. We would drink together and all fall asleep in the same room together. During this process, what was important for the lead actress was for her to feel protected, and it was important for us to really embrace her, and not to have her feel that she was being exploited in any way. So we developed a great relationship, like brothers and sisters. [x]

(via moviemeatloaf)

Photo
fuckyeahasianhorror:

zangiev:

abatida:

fuckyeahasianhorror:

Charlize Theron is “Lady Vengeance”
….not happy….
but to be honest, it could have been worse, A LOT worse. If Megan Fox were to have this part i wouldve shat bricks. Some say Natalie Portman wouldve been a better pick…hmm

Reblogging because people didn’t know about this

After seeing her in Prometheus I think it could be okay.

Wow, I originally posted this on October 2012 O.o, but anyhow. Well, now that i’ve seen “Monster” and “Battle In Seattle” she’s ok. JUST ok though. Like throughout her whole filmography I just can’t really picture her taking in that role. But…I might be wrong, I just can’t see her in that role.

sobs

fuckyeahasianhorror:

zangiev:

abatida:

fuckyeahasianhorror:

Charlize Theron is “Lady Vengeance”

….not happy….

but to be honest, it could have been worse, A LOT worse. If Megan Fox were to have this part i wouldve shat bricks. Some say Natalie Portman wouldve been a better pick…hmm

Reblogging because people didn’t know about this

After seeing her in Prometheus I think it could be okay.

Wow, I originally posted this on October 2012 O.o, but anyhow. Well, now that i’ve seen “Monster” and “Battle In Seattle” she’s ok. JUST ok though. Like throughout her whole filmography I just can’t really picture her taking in that role. But…I might be wrong, I just can’t see her in that role.

sobs

Photo

(Source: moviedetails)

Photo

(Source: hs-gifs)

Photo

(Source: hs-gifs)